Management for Doctors: Conflict, power, negotiation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Attitude-Based Strategic Negotiation for Conflict Management in Construction Projects
■ An innovative negotiation methodology for managing conflicts in construction projects is presented in this article where multiple decision makers are involved. The proposed negotiation methodology has a unique ability to consider the attitudes of the decision makers, which is an important psychological factor in the negotiations that take place in various stages of a construction project. The...
متن کاملConflict management: a primer for doctors in training.
Conflict in the health arena is a growing concern and is well recognised for doctors in training. Its most extreme expression, workplace violence is on the increase. There is evidence that many conflicts remain unsatisfactorily resolved or unresolved, and result in ongoing issues for staff morale. This paper describes the nature of conflict in the health care system and identifies the differenc...
متن کاملE-Negotiation Support for Boundary Conflict Resolution
This paper proposes multi-agent e-negotiation support architecture for boundary conflict resolution. We use intelligent agents to act as human assistants during the negotiation task and provide means and resources for making final decisions in case there is a discrepancy in opinions about the decision matter. As an illustration we describe a scenario in marine weather forecasting and discuss ho...
متن کاملManagement for doctors.
Management is not confined to the forewalls of the industry; it is indispensable everywhere whether it be a hospital, an educational institution, agriculture, army, trade-union, government administration, charitable institution, club or one’s own home. Management is that “What managers do”. Manager’s role is like a Doctor or Physician. As a Doctor must be aware of all the systems in a human bod...
متن کاملPower Dynamics in Negotiation
Power is widely acknowledged to affect negotiator performance. Yet few efforts have been made to integrate the most prominent theories of power into a cohesive framework that can account for the results from a broad array of negotiation-relevant research. We address this limitation by proposing a dynamic integrative model that decouples power into four components: (1) potential power, (2) perce...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 1995
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6972.104